Position
What we will not print on a wristband
A short list of things we decline to produce, and the reasoning for each. Two of them are requested regularly.
A child's name and a parent's phone number
This is the most frequent request on the list and the one we argue about most. A band printed with a child's name lets a stranger address that child by name, and a band printed with a parent's mobile number publishes it to everyone who walks past the pool. The pattern that works is a large reference code and one instruction — found child, take to reception — so identity stays inside the property's systems and the finder needs no judgement. We will produce that version immediately, and we will keep explaining why before producing the other one.
Unqualified environmental adjectives
We do not print "eco", "green", "natural" or "biodegradable" as bare claims, and we do not put a recycling symbol on a band that ordinary municipal streams will not accept. Our cork faces are agglomerated with a polymer binder, so a cork band is not compostable and we will not describe it as such. A claim that collapses when a guest reads the small print does more damage to a property than never having made it.
Certification marks we cannot evidence
Certification marks belong to the bodies that issue them and mean something specific about how a material was tracked from source to finished goods. We offer certified material options with supporting production documentation, and that is the extent of what we will say. We will not print a licence code, we will not imply that the company or the full range is certified, and we will not let a marketing line do work that a document should be doing.
Third-party brand names
No chip family names, no lock vendor names, no hotel brand names on a band or anywhere on this site. Those marks belong to their owners, and using them — even accurately, even as a compatibility statement — puts a relationship in a reader's mind that does not exist. Where a distinction genuinely depends on a proprietary product, we describe the behaviour and say that the name has to come from the property's own documentation.
Related
Read next.
Position
Why we will not claim universal compatibility
Every competitor page says "compatible with all major systems". It cannot be true, and the properties who believe it find out too late.
Read the notePosition
What a recycled claim has to survive
Recycled yarn performs like virgin polyester. What differs is lot colour consistency and whether you can evidence the claim.
Read the note
No obligation · reply within one working day
Disagree with any of this?
Most of these positions came from properties telling us we were wrong about something. Send the enquiry, and the argument if you have one.